Marvin vs. User Evidence

Don't cap your proof at what a survey can hold.

Marvin turns every customer conversation into proof—from win/loss calls to support tickets. And when you’re missing evidence, the AI moderator interviews customers to fill the gap.

4.8 on G2.com
4.8 on Capterra

Book A Demo Today!

Thanks for submitting the form.
Trusted by world-class brands
Why Marvin

Three gaps evaluators hit with UserEvidence

01
The feedback that matters most isn't in a survey
The churn reason, the objection, the workaround your customer invented — those come out in conversation, not in a rating scale.
In Marvin
Interviews, sales calls, support tickets, surveys and docs all land in one repository — recorded, transcribed in 40+ languages, and labelled automatically.
02
A proof library only answers the questions you already asked
Templated stat cards are fine until the exec asks something the survey didn't cover. Then you're back to reading transcripts.
In Marvin
Ask AI anything across the whole repository. Deep Research runs thematic analysis and hypothesis testing without anyone tagging a thing.
03
A verified stat isn't the same as a chain of evidence
A badge says the number was checked. It doesn't let a product team follow the claim back to the customer who said it.
In Marvin
Every insight links to the timestamped clip behind it. Share the report by link — no login needed to watch the moment it came from.
Side by side

Both tools start with the customer. Only one of them keeps the conversation.

Capability
Marvin
UserEvidence
The job it's built for
Collecting and Producing proof assets at scale
Producing proof assets to sell with
Unstructured conversation analysis
Interviews, sales calls, tickets, docs
Survey responses, some call analysis
In-product AI interviewer
Yes — AI runs the follow-ups, at scale
AI Interviewer Not Supported
Recording & transcription
Built in, 40+ languages
Recording Not Supported
Ask AI across everything you've ever collected
Yes — open questions, cited answers
Search within the proof library
Thematic analysis & hypothesis testing
Deep Research, no manual tagging needed
Classifiers on survey answers
Evidence traceable to the source
Every claim links to the timestamped clip
Stat-level verification badge
Teams you can collaborate with
GTM, Product Marketing, Market Research, User Research
GTM, product marketing
Try before you buy
Free plan for 2 users, free trial
Sales-led demo
3 Steps

Why teams move to Marvin

Three things evaluators tell us after they've run both.
01

01

vs

One repository, not one more silo

Survey answers, interview recordings, Gong calls and support tickets land in the same place, tagged the same way. Nobody has to remember which tool the answer lives in.

02

01

vs

Answers, not templated output

Ask "what makes enterprise buyers hesitate?" and get an answer built from every conversation you've had — with the clips it came from, not a formatted stat card.

03

01

vs

Evidence you can defend

Every insight traces back to the sentence a real customer said, at the timestamp they said it. Research rigour that survives a sceptical exec.

Your next proof point is already on a recording.

Bring one quarter of customer calls to the demo and we'll pull the quotes, stats and stories out of them live.